Tamalpais Union High School District · 2020–2026

The district already
collects this data.Nobody is acting on it.

Every number on this page comes from the district's own reporting — state test results, the California Healthy Kids Survey, board grade reports and the district's own accountability plans. Across ten measures of how students are doing, the distance between Black and White students got wider on six, stayed flat on two, and closed on two. Over the same five years, the board removed most of the programs built to close it.

48%of Black students got at least one D, F or Incomplete in 2025 — up from 29% in 2022. For White students the figure has held at 8%.
9%of Black students tested proficient in math in 2025, down from 14% in 2022. Among White students, 58%.
$400Kin equity staffing and programming cut from a $128 million annual budget — about three tenths of one percent.

Ten measures, five years

Each chart shows the most recent year reported. The blue bar is the distance between Black and White students, measured in percentage points — the gap itself, drawn to scale.

School climate

Whether students feel safe, welcome and able to show up.

Harassment

Reported being harassed at school in the past 12 months, 2024

Gap in 2022
13 pts
Gap in 2024
17 pts
Since 2022
Widened

Black students: 36% in 2022, 41% in 2024. California Healthy Kids Survey, averaged across grades.

Safety

Say they feel safe at school, 2024

Gap in 2022
21 pts
Gap in 2024
22 pts
Since 2022
No improvement

Black students: 62% in 2022, 63% in 2024. California Healthy Kids Survey, averaged across grades.

Connection

Say they feel connected to their school, 2024

Gap in 2022
27 pts
Gap in 2024
28 pts
Since 2022
No improvement

Black students: 45% in 2022, 47% in 2024. California Healthy Kids Survey, averaged across grades.

Attendance

Missed 10% or more of the school year, 2025

Gap in 2022
18 pts
Gap in 2025
24 pts
Since 2022
Widened

Black students: 30.3% in 2022, 37.4% in 2025. Ed-Data.org.

Suspension

Suspended at least once during the school year, 2025

Gap in 2022
2.9 pts
Gap in 2025
8 pts
Since 2022
Widened

Black students: 3% in 2022, 9% in 2025. Ed-Data.org. Note the 0–20% scale..

Academic outcomes

Grades, proficiency, course access and readiness for college.

Course grades

Received at least one D, F or Incomplete semester grade, 2025

Gap in 2022
21 pts
Gap in 2025
40 pts
Since 2022
Widened

Black students: 29% in 2022, 48% in 2025. District board report.

English

Proficient in English language arts, 2025

Gap in 2021
41.5 pts
Gap in 2025
48 pts
Since 2021
Widened

Black students: 37.5% in 2021, 27% in 2025. Ed-Data.org.

Math

Proficient in mathematics, 2025

Gap in 2022
50.1 pts
Gap in 2025
49 pts
Since 2022
Narrowed

Black students: 14.3% in 2022, 9% in 2025. Ed-Data.org.

Advanced Placement

Enrolled in one or more AP courses, 2025

Gap in 2022
24 pts
Gap in 2025
26 pts
Since 2022
Widened

Black students: 20% in 2022, 27% in 2025. District LCAP reports.

College readiness

Completed the A–G coursework required for UC and CSU, 2025

Gap in 2022
45 pts
Gap in 2025
37 pts
Since 2022
Narrowed

Black students: 29% in 2022, 50% in 2025. District LCAP reports.

The honest tally. Of the ten measures above, the Black–White gap widened on six, showed no meaningful improvement on two, and narrowed on two. A-G college-readiness completion is the real bright spot: it rose for every group, and the Black–White gap closed by eight points.

The math gap is the one place a narrowing number misleads. It shrank by roughly a point — but only because White proficiency fell too. Black proficiency dropped from 14% to 9% over the same period. A gap can close while everyone is losing ground.

Where the numbers moved at all for Black students, they mostly moved the wrong way: harassment up, chronic absence up, D/F/I grades up nineteen points, English proficiency down ten, math down five.

Why we measure belonging, not just test scores

The first five charts are about safety, harassment and connection. That isn't a detour from academics. It is one of the better-established findings in education research.

Belonging predicts achievement

A student's sense of being known and included at school is one of the more reliable predictors of how they perform in it. It shapes motivation, persistence and willingness to take on hard work.

ASCD · MIT Teaching & Learning Lab

Discrimination has measurable academic cost

Experiencing racial hostility at school produces chronic stress that depresses engagement and learning outcomes. The effect shows up in the classroom, not only in how students feel.

National Library of Medicine · American Psychological Association

Gaps are a measurement tool

Tracking outcomes by group is how a district finds out where opportunity is missing and where to direct resources. Stop disaggregating the data and you lose the ability to see the problem, not the problem itself.

Learning Policy Institute · CA Legislative Analyst

California districts are required to identify and address outcome gaps for significant racial and ethnic groups as part of the accountability plan process (Education Code § 52052). This is not optional reporting.

Built, then taken apart

The district spent four years building the structures that address these gaps, and roughly eighteen months removing them.

2020–24Build

The district commits, and staffs the commitment

An antiracist resolution in 2020, a racial equity policy in 2022, and an accountability plan that made closing these gaps a central goal. To carry it out the district created a Senior Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, a Racial Justice Task Force with an expert facilitator, an ethnic studies curriculum team, a youth advisory, a Marin City coalition, and the Black Student Success Team and Hub at Tamalpais High.

2024–26Dismantle

A new board majority removes the structures

  • The DEI director position was eliminated in December 2025, folded into a school consolidation plan without a separate agenda item or public discussion.
  • The Racial Justice Task Force lost its facilitator contract and its $80,000 budget mid-year. Membership fell from more than fifty to a handful.
  • The Black Student Success Team's leadership contracts were ended on a 3–2 vote, after offers of outside funding — including from the county superintendent — were declined.
  • The superintendent who had designed the plan left in the summer of 2025.
  • The 2026–27 accountability plan contains no budget line for the Hub, and its board presentation does not mention race or the gaps above.
Equity commitments in the 2024–25 accountability plan, and what remains.
CommitmentBudgeted 2024–25Status
Districtwide student learning events on race and bias$114,000Cut to $20,000, then eliminated
Mentoring, mediation and academic support for students of color$120,000Cut to $66,000
Dean of Student Success, San Andreas continuation school$180,000Eliminated
Racial Justice Task Force$80,000Eliminated
Senior Director of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion$67,594Eliminated
Youth Advisory for Racial Justice$12,500Eliminated
Roughly, against a $128 million annual budget~$400,0000.3%

For scale: the district spends more than $15 million a year on special education programming. The equity line was never a budget problem. It was a priority decision.

How to check this

Every figure here is public. We would rather you verify it than take our word for it, so here is exactly where it comes from and where it is imperfect.

Sources

Ed-Data.org and the California School Dashboard for test proficiency, absence and suspension. District board reports for semester grades. District accountability plans for AP and A-G completion. The California Healthy Kids Survey for harassment, safety and connection.

What we did to the survey data

The Healthy Kids Survey reports results split by race and grade, which produces dozens of small figures that can't be compared directly. We averaged responses across grades within each racial group. That is the step that makes the trend visible, and it is the step to check first if you want to test our numbers.

Known limits

Some district reporting is not broken out by race at all, and some drops Black students entirely when the group is small — which is also why small-sample years should be read with caution. Sources occasionally disagree by a point or two. We flag the bright spots and the narrowing gaps rather than only the bad ones.

Terms

“Gap” means the difference in percentage points between Black and White students in the same year, not a percentage change. Group labels follow the source data. Asian and Latinx students are shown on every chart even where the narrative focuses on the widest gaps.

Three seats. Use all three votes.

The board sets district policy, hires the superintendent and approves the budget. It is the level at which this record was made, and the level at which it can change.

Joy Scully KooCommunity advocate and parent joyfortamdistrict.org
Brian SutherlandConstitutional lawyer and parent brianfortamdistrict.org
Valerie WynnRetired district teacher valeriefortamdistrict.com
Oct 5Ballots mailed
Nov 3Last day to vote
Vote for 3Tam District board

Data and analysis drawn from the TUHSD Racial Equity Report Card 2020–2026, prepared by MVFREE (mvfree.org), and from district records obtained through the California Public Records Act. Charts on this page were rebuilt from the underlying figures; gap calculations are our own. Corrections welcome.